War can have an adverse affect on the lives of people - the young and the old. Write an essay that argues how war adversely impacts the lives of children.
Gods were not always quite so capable as that, for example in Zoroastrianism good and evil really were fighting against each other and neither was all-powerful. Primitive gods could literally and physically fight against evil.
Omnipotency is incompatible with benevolence. The reasons that such contradictions appear between the existence of god and the existence of aspects of reality is because the whole idea of god is problematic. If there is no god and if suffering and pain result from purely biological effects and the physical laws of the universe, with no underlying divine cause, then the problem of evil disappears.
There is no real "good" and "evil", there is just evolved life, struggling to survive in an uncaring universe. It happens that this atheistic state appears to match perfectly with the truth of the matter. The Inhumane Effects of the Justifications of Evil 5 christianity judaism There has been a long Christian history of horrible explanations of evil, wherein all blame is put on the victims.
Disabled people, stillborn babies, the suffering of children and adults alike has all, from time to time, been explained as punishment for their sins. If not actual behaviour, then for thought crime, and, sometimes, the punishment itself is in order to prevent some serious sin happening in the future.
The theory goes that God never punishes people through random bouts of suffering by accident: If suffering seems unjust and unfair, then, it is merely the case that God is judging and punishing people for reasons that their fellow Humans do not comprehend.
Thoughts like these kill all sense of compassion and caring, and scupper any chance of granting relief to the victim. Everything is our fault: It is not our job to try and alleviate the pain that God has seen fit to bring upon us!
I am sure that most modern, moral, readers, must react in horror to such an inhumane dismissal of evil. Many may even, through wishful thinking and ignorance, disclaim that no-one has held to such a monstrous justification. That is, we all deserve punishment simply for being human, until such a time as we are saved, if we ever are.
This was not mere philosophizing - the Christian church in the dark ages really did ban medicine and physicians on the grounds that our bodies deserve their pains and diseases.
The same went for childbirth - it is painful and dangerous for women, because God made it that way as a punishment for all women 8 Genesis 3: Their activities were seen as a "direct affront to the divinely ordained pain of childbirth" and, according to a Scottish clergyman, "vitiating the primal curse of women" 9.
For the same reasons, "when the great American discovery of anaesthetics was applied in obstetrical cases, it was discouraged [because] it was an impious attempt to escape from the curse denounced against all women in Genesis iii.
Martin Luther, the founder of Protestantism, taught the same: The following statement epitomizes the Christian approach to female welfare: Let them die in childbirth - that is why they are there" This outright dismissal of pain and suffering arises because religious theology cannot answer the fundamental question as to why there is evil and suffering in the world.
The result is a morality that can have a profoundly negative effect on human compassion. What is good for one being is frequently bad for another. For example in nature the whole cycle of biological life is based on death and recycling.
Hence why major religions have historically been based around these themes, especially vegetation gods who are reborn every Winter Solstice. In nature, survival is violent and competitive. Is Objective Truth Obtainable? What is good for them is bad for us.
While antibiotics are good for us and reduce our suffering, their usage creates suffering and death for countless other minor species.
What is good for one species is bad for others. While one culture may consider multiple marriage to be a virtue of love and positivity, another considers it an evil sin.One such argument that the believer must justify in order to maintain the possibility of God's existence is the problem of evil.
In his essay, "The Problem of Evil," by Richard Swinburne, the author attempts to explain how evil can exist in a world created by an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent Being, namely God.
The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the existence of God can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world.
The problem simply stems from basic beliefs or assumptions pertaining to the attributes of God: God is perfectly good, omniscient, and omnipotent. A set evil problem the of essay of procedures identified by genealogical or biological composition.
A classical education has become corrupted by the unused amounts of user participation or majority of their climatic, ecological, technological, socioeconomic, public health, and growth.
The general argument is that a world where humans are allowed to have a free will but commit moral evils is greater than a world that has no free will with any evil.. After realizing the flaw to premise (4) of the LAE, Rowe released his own version of the Argument from Evil in which he called the Evidential Argument of Evil (EAE).
It states/5(8). Library of essays on arguments from evil of the non-existence of God on ashio-midori.com, a series of powerful essays. The Problem Of Evil by Christian Rev. D.R. Deinsen, a good all round introduction on the subject. Argumentative Essay. Prompt: War can have an adverse affect on the lives of people - the young and the old.
Write an essay that argues how war adversely impacts the lives of children. Middle School Argumentative Essay Example. Living during a war is difficult for anyone, but especially for children.